I dont think the generalization is correct Dads are just as protective as moms. There are other generalizations in our society that are also wrong and would disappoint many of us if they were portrayed in a comic book .
I dont think the generalization is correct Dads are just as protective as moms. There are other generalizations in our society that are also wrong and would disappoint many of us if they were portrayed in a comic book .
Not meaning to touch any nerves here (isn't that a surgeon's job?); we have all heard of a mother's instinct, something ingrained into a woman from carrying a life within her for (up to) nine months.
A father's ability to protect his child at great lengths, would be based more upon something learned, rather than an instinct based mainly upon biology.
It may not ALWAYS hold true, but, in general, it does hold true most of the time. And, yes, i DO know mothers without those instincts (or at least not very strong ones).
NEVER, EVER, was it suggested that this has to do with loving a child more or less. And it was NEVER said by me that only mothers make good parents, either. Let's not find fault by putting words in one's mouth, okay? Again, if i hit a nerve, i am sorry i did so; but i still stand behind what i wrote. And, yes, i AM a loving father of one great girl.
Support Artists, Not Companies! Creator-owned comics are where the real art is at!
My new website! http://lifelessordinarywebnovel.com/home.html Follow my super-powered web-novel adventures, "Life Less Ordinary"!
Twitter (1) = @RealWyldeChild
Twitter (2) = @lifewebnovel
FaceBook = https://www.facebook.com/realwylde.child or search for me at " Life Less-Ordinary "
Also 'occasionally' ranting Alpha Flight related stuff at http://canadas-own-the-flight.blogspot.com/
Yeah I know the theory. Completely disagree with it. Let's move on though. Why don't we wait to see what happens with the baby before we start playing Nature vs. Nurture Smackdown, ok?!??!Originally Posted by Flightpath07
I think the betrayer will be Hedwig.
This week I'm definitely leaning towards Aurora being the traitor!
I'm still confused, but have it narrowed down to 8. From the pics in the the last interview Aurora could be the traitor, but viewed in a different context Mac could be the one.
Del
Driftwood: Well, I got about a foot and a half. Now, it says, uh, "The party of the second part shall be known in this contract as the party of the second part."
Fiorello: Well, I don't know about that...
Driftwood: Now what's the matter?
Fiorello: I no like-a the second party, either.
Driftwood: Well, you should've come to the first party. We didn't get home 'til around four in the morning... I was blind for three days!
The Box robot attacking people makes me think that Box is the traitor! Too obvious? I know Roger Bochs is dead and Jeffries is over at the X-Men but he does look like an Alpha Flight member is attacking other Alphans. Also, is Jerome Jaxon back?
But wasn't he brain-dead last time we saw him?
There's no way they could be bringing back a brain-dead ordinary human with a history with Alph--
Oh.
I'll shut up.
- Le Messor
"I’d love to, but I’m up to my elbows in waxy buildup."
I suspect that those pics of Box are along the lines of Box-Bots made by Gary Cody and the Unity party to hunt down AF after they refuse to tote the line.
Ben
I may be the only one that is loving this idea of the team splitting against eachother. It does sound like a really good fresh side where you want to root for one team but root for both in a way. Also, I love the redone look for PurpleWoman and I hope they use her more.. She learned to use a straightener.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
